This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cachildwelfareclearinghouse.org/
This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cachildwelfareclearinghouse.org/
Type of Maltreatment: Not specified
Target Population: This program is not a client-specific intervention, but a full-system approach that targets the entire organization. The focus is to create a trauma-informed and trauma-sensitive environment in which specific trauma-focused interventions can be effectively implemented.
Brief Description:
The Sanctuary Model has been rated by the CEBC in the areas of Higher Level of Placement and Trauma Treatment for Children. The Sanctuary Model represents a trauma-informed method for creating or changing an organizational culture in order to more effectively provide a cohesive context within which healing from psychological and social traumatic experience can be addressed. It is a whole system approach designed to facilitate the development of structures, processes, and behaviors, on the part of staff, children, and the community-as-a-whole, that can counteract the biological, affective, cognitive, social, and existential wounds suffered by the children in care.
Provisional feedback form not available in printout. Please access the website to use the form.
The aims of the Sanctuary Model are to guide an organization in the development of a culture with seven dominant characteristics all of which serve goals related a sound treatment environment:
Sanctuary Model was not designed to be conducted in a group.
Sanctuary Model has not been tested for use in a group setting.
Recommended intensity: This program is not a client-specific intervention, but a full-system approach that targets the entire organization. The focus is to create a trauma-informed and trauma-sensitive environment in which specific trauma-focused interventions can be effectively implemented.
Recommended duration: This question is not applicable for this program.
Sanctuary Model does not include a homework component.
Sanctuary Model is typically conducted in a(n): Hospital and Residential Care Facility.
Sanctuary Model was not designed with a Parent Component.
Sanctuary Model was not designed with a Child Component.
Sanctuary Model was not developed for children with developmental delays.
Sanctuary Model has not been tested for children with developmental delays.
Sanctuary Model was not designed for specific racial/ethnic/cultural groups.
Sanctuary Model was not tested in specific racial/ethnic/cultural groups.
There is not a manual that describes how to implement this program.
There is training available for Sanctuary Model.
Training contact: Brian Farragher at Andrus Center for Leaning & Innovation
Number of days/hours: The training lasts 5 days and if followed by a 30-month consultation period.
Training is obtained: Organizations interested in the program are encouraged to attend an information session. The information session provides an in-depth firsthand view of implementation of the model. If an agency deems itself ready to commit to the full implementation, the agency is subjected to a rigorous initial assessment. The assessment includes reflections from leadership on their readiness and willingness to implement the model, and an on-site visit from a trainer to better assess the organization's culture. Commitment to implement the model is a prerequisite for training.
Training then takes place on the grounds of the Andrus Children's Center. Agencies are asked to bring a core team of individuals who will be used within the organization to implement the model. Agencies and their core team take part in a 5-day intensive training process covering all aspects of implementation of the model. Agencies are then offered two additional years of consultation.
There currently are additional qualified resources for training.
List of additional qualified resources: Sanctuary Leadership Development Institute, Andrus Children’s Center, Center for Learning & Innovation
The typical resources for implementing Sanctuary Model are: The resources for implementation vary by organization. Organizational change can happen without direct dollars, however, a core team and leadership must spend time on process.
The minimum qualifications for an organization to participate are a fundamental readiness to change the way it does business and an enlightened leadership team that is willing and able to lead this change process.
Rivard, J.C., Bloom, S.L., McCorkle, D., & Abramowitz, R. (2005). Preliminary results of a study examining the implementation and effects of a trauma recovery framework for youths in residential treatment. Therapeutic Community,26(1), 83-96.
Type of Study: Non-randomized control group
Number of participants: 158
Population:
Location/Institution: Northeastern U.S.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Testing took place on a campus housing a number of residential units. Four of these units self-selected to implement the Sanctuary Model and an additional four units were randomly assigned to receive the intervention. Residents in eight further units served as control participants who did not receive the intervention. Measures were taken to evaluation the implementation of the Sanctuary Model and outcomes for youths receiving treatment. Youth outcomes were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale, the peer form of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, the Youth Coping Index, and the Social Problem Solving Questionnaire. Assessments were taken at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. No significant differences were found between groups at baseline or at 3 months. At six months there were a few differences showing a positive effect for the Sanctuary Model. Youth receiving the intervention scored lower on a measure of coping strategies that tend to increase interpersonal conflict or minimize or exaggerate interpersonal issues. They also exhibited a greater sense of personal control as measured by the Locus of Control Scale. Finally they reduced use of verbal aggression, while control participants scored higher on verbal aggression over time. Staff also completed the Community Oriented Programs Environment Scale (COPES) which assesses aspects of the functioning of the therapeutic community. There were no significant differences between conditions a baseline and at three months. At 6 months, units using the Sanctuary Model scored significantly better on the total scale and on the subscales of Support, Spontaneity, Autonomy, Problem Orientation, and Safety.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.
Rivard, J. C. (2004). Initial findings of an evaluation of a trauma recovery framework in residential treatment. Residential Group Quarterly 5(1): 3-5.
Bloom, S.L.(2005) Creating sanctuary for kids: helping children to heal from violence. Therapeutic Community: The International Journal for Therapeutic and Supportive Organizations 26(1): 57-63.
Farragher, B., Yanosy, S. (2005) Creating a trauma-sensitive culture in residential treatment. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal for Therapeutic and Supportive Organizations 26(1): 97-113.
Contact name: Brian Farragher, LMSW
Affiliation/Agency: Andrus Children's Center
Email: bfarragher@JDAM.org
Phone: 914-965-3700x1273
Fax: 914-798-5544
Website: http://www.andruschildren.org